Author summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 4,377 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Melissa Gomez results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 18.4% saturation with 2,543 hits . Analysis detected 17,030 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,822 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 52% (3,019 of 6,263 authors). This Melissa Gomez is worse (more manipulative) than 51.80% of the peer group. Melissa Gomez
Author details
Total words: 13,822
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.8% percentile 2.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles13.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 15.4% 15.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.9% 8.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.4% 1.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.0% 0.0% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Author 4.0% 4.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 15.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 18.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 6.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Red Herring: Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Bandwagon: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Begging the Question: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst