Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,260 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sandra McDonald results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Loss Aversion , Appeal to Emotion , and Optimism Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5.5% saturation with 402 hits . Analysis detected 3,112 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,336 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 10% (5,741 of 6,341 authors). This Sandra McDonald is better (less manipulative) than 90.50% of the peer group. Sandra McDonald
Author details
Total words: 7,336
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.5% percentile 1.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.5% 5.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.5%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Loss Aversion: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst