Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 890 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emily Crane results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Unattributed Quote , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 27.2% saturation with 862 hits . Analysis detected 5,745 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,166 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of 87% (900 of 6,628 authors). This Emily Crane is worse (more manipulative) than 86.40% of the peer group. Emily Crane
Author details
Total words: 3,166
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
86% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 86.4% percentile 5.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 27.2% 27.2% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 16.5% 16.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 12.7% 12.7% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 9.0% 9.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 26.7% 26.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.8% 6.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.5% 4.5% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 5.2% 5.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 27.2%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 12.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 26.7%, sitewide 19.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 16.5%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 15.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 10.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.1%, sitewide 8.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 9.0%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Begging the Question: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.4% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.4% False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst