Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos2,603 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Savannah Guthrie results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Emotion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 1,334 hits. Analysis detected 9,620 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,871 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (8,326 of 15,780 topics). This Savannah Guthrie is better (less manipulative) than 52.80% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

47% percentile
025507510047.2% percentile
2.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.3%7.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.1%9.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.8%7.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.2%2.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 15.0%15.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 15.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 3.7%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos