Topic summary
23% 5 analyzed articles/videos 5,799 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Public Service results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and Halo Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 2,351 hits . Analysis detected 21,281 faulty-reasoning hits from 25,594 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 15% (14,100 of 16,494 topics). This Public Service is better (less manipulative) than 85.50% of the peer group. Public Service
Topic details
Total words: 25,594
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.5% percentile 1.7% BS Score5 analyzed articles25.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.2% 9.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.0% 0.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst