Publication summary
20% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,057 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alameda Post results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Confirmation Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 761 hits . Analysis detected 4,733 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,770 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 46% (222 of 410 publications). This Alameda Post is better (less manipulative) than 54.00% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 7,770
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
46% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.0% percentile 1.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 6.7% 6.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 3.8% 3.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 5.7% 5.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 2.9% 2.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 1.4% 1.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 6.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 5.7%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Publication 9.8%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 0.5% Bandwagon: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst