Topic summary
51% 11 analyzed articles/videos 11,729 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Public Lands results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Halo Effect , and Optimism Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 4,542 hits . Analysis detected 40,237 faulty-reasoning hits from 56,533 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 5% (15,450 of 16,194 topics). This Public Lands is better (less manipulative) than 95.40% of the peer group. Public Lands
Topic details
Total words: 56,533
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 4.6% percentile 1.4% BS Score11 analyzed articles56.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.0% 8.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst