Topic summary
73% 10 analyzed articles/videos 6,023 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Presidential Election results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 3,900 hits . Analysis detected 34,862 faulty-reasoning hits from 28,613 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 34% (11,005 of 16,562 topics). This Presidential Election is better (less manipulative) than 66.40% of the peer group. Presidential Election
Topic details
Total words: 28,613
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.6% percentile 2.3% BS Score10 analyzed articles28.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.2% 10.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.9% 10.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 13.6% 13.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 2.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst