Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Stephanie Kaloi results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 25.4% saturation with 271 hits. Analysis detected 2,275 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,065 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,346 authors). This Stephanie Kaloi is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Stephanie Kaloi
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Stephanie Kaloi (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 1,065
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 17.6%17.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 16.0%16.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 18.0%18.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 13.6%13.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 16.3%16.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 5.3%5.3%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 7.3%7.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 5.2%5.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 3.7%3.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 25.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 21.2%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 18.0%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 17.6%, sitewide 0.8%Hasty Generalization: Author 16.3%, sitewide 8.1%Unattributed Quote: Author 16.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Emotion: Author 13.4%, sitewide 15.9%Recency Bias: Author 13.6%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Authority: Author 12.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 9.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 7.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 3.1%Optimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 5.3%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Author 5.2%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.0%Indoctrination: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.9%Burden of Proof: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos