Topic summary
10% 8 analyzed articles/videos 3,217 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Planetary Science results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 1,020 hits . Analysis detected 8,025 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,033 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 17% (12,915 of 15,485 topics). This Planetary Science is better (less manipulative) than 83.40% of the peer group. Planetary Science
Topic details
Total words: 13,033
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.6% percentile 1.8% BS Score8 analyzed articles13K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst