Author summary
6%7 analyzed articles/videos3,585 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lisa Grossman results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Hasty Generalization, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 722 hits. Analysis detected 5,537 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,528 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 3% (6,430 of 6,628 authors). This Lisa Grossman is better (less manipulative) than 97.00% of the peer group.
Lisa Grossman
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
3%Lisa Grossman (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 12,528
Article count: 7
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

3% percentile
02550751003.0% percentile
1.1% BS Score7 analyzed articles12.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.6%3.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.2%2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.5%3.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.1%2.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.8%2.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.3%0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate