Author summary
6% 7 analyzed articles/videos 3,585 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lisa Grossman results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Hasty Generalization , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 722 hits . Analysis detected 5,537 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,528 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 3% (6,430 of 6,628 authors). This Lisa Grossman is better (less manipulative) than 97.00% of the peer group. Lisa Grossman
Author details
Total words: 12,528
Article count: 7
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.0% percentile 1.1% BS Score7 analyzed articles12.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.3% 0.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst