The 2024 New York City meteorite contains amino acids 4%

By Lisa Grossman6%

7/15/2026, 6:00:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 11 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Overconfidence Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 19.2% saturation with 70 hits. Analysis detected 288 faulty-reasoning hits from 365 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 16.8% and a BS Rank of 4% (20,502 of 21,204 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 96.70% of the article peer group.

A meteorite that streaked over New York City and crashed into a NewA meteorite that streaked over New York City and crashed into a New Jersey rooftop came from an asteroid that once had briny water beneath its surface. 
The rock may have a similar composition to those that brought water and organic materials to early Earth, researchers report July 15 in Science Advances. 
The meteorite lit up the daytime sky and created a sonic boom over the New York metropolitan area on July 16, 2024. 
The space rock, which was originally about 53 kilograms, entered Earth’s atmosphere at 14 kilometers per second and exploded with an energy equivalent to 1.3 metric tons of TNT. 
Fortuitously, the homeowner picked the fragments up with gloved hands and aluminum foil and immediately placed them in glass jars to isolate them from Earthly contamination. 
Most meteorites found on Earth have sat on the ground or in the dirt for an unknown amount of time, so it’s hard to tell apart the rock’s original composition from local detritus. 
Previous meteorites found on the ground days or hours after landing are scientific treasure troves. 
For a rock that fell to Earth on its own, “this is about as good as it gets,” Jenniskens says. 
The meteorite is a CM carbonaceous chondrite, thought to be one type of rock that delivered water and organic material to the early Earth. 
It probably came from a protoplanet that formed just outside the orbit of Jupiter. 
Studying it could help researchers identify the specific ingredients that created life here. 
The meteorite contains fragments of material that is rich in sodium compared with materials in similar meteorites, suggesting brines once altered the rock. 
It also contains organic matter and types of amino acids that are rare on Earth. 
These molecules probably formed inside the asteroid during a period when salty water allowed complex chemistry to take place. 
Jenniskens urges people to not fear a meteorite hitting your own house. 
Not only is it unlikely to happen, but “it’s a treasure,” he says. 
“It’s an honor. 
I think you are very lucky if it happens to you.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Lisa Grossman: 2.1%Science News: 2.6%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lisa Grossman: 1.4%Science News: 1.1%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lisa Grossman: 2.2%Science News: 2.5%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Lisa Grossman: 1.2%Science News: 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Lisa Grossman: 0.1%Science News: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 9.0%Lisa Grossman: 1.5%Science News: 2.5%Overconfidence Bias9.0%This article: 3.6%Lisa Grossman: 3.6%Science News: 4.3%Framing Effect3.6%This article: 0.0%Lisa Grossman: 0.0%Science News: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Lisa Grossman: 0.9%Science News: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lisa Grossman: 0.1%Science News: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 19.2%Lisa Grossman: 5.8%Science News: 4.2%Optimism Bias19.2%This article: 0.0%Lisa Grossman: 1.0%Science News: 1.2%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lisa Grossman: 1.9%Science News: 4.0%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lisa Grossman: 0.1%Science News: 0.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lisa Grossman: 0.0%Science News: 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Lisa Grossman: 0.0%Science News: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lisa Grossman: 0.0%Science News: 0.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lisa Grossman: 0.0%Science News: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 4.1%Lisa Grossman: 1.2%Science News: 1.3%Halo Effect4.1%This article: 0.0%Lisa Grossman: 0.0%Science News: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lisa Grossman: 0.0%Science News: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lisa Grossman: 0.9%Science News: 0.8%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lisa Grossman: 0.6%Science News: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lisa Grossman: 0.2%Science News: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lisa Grossman: 0.0%Science News: 0.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Lisa Grossman: 0.0%Science News: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.8%Lisa Grossman: 3.5%Science News: 4.6%Appeal to Authority6.8%This article: 0.0%Lisa Grossman: 1.4%Science News: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Lisa Grossman: 0.3%Science News: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Lisa Grossman: 0.1%Science News: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 3.6%Lisa Grossman: 2.8%Science News: 4.0%Hasty Generalization3.6%This article: 0.0%Lisa Grossman: 0.0%Science News: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Lisa Grossman: 0.3%Science News: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 7.4%Lisa Grossman: 2.2%Science News: 2.6%Appeal to Emotion7.4%This article: 0.0%Lisa Grossman: 0.6%Science News: 0.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 11.5%Lisa Grossman: 1.4%Science News: 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)11.5%This article: 0.0%Lisa Grossman: 0.0%Science News: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Lisa Grossman: 0.2%Science News: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Lisa Grossman: 0.4%Science News: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Lisa Grossman: 0.3%Science News: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 4.1%Lisa Grossman: 0.3%Science News: 1.2%Anecdotal4.1%This article: 0.0%Lisa Grossman: 0.3%Science News: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Lisa Grossman: 1.0%Science News: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Lisa Grossman: 0.0%Science News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Lisa Grossman: 0.1%Science News: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Lisa Grossman: 0.5%Science News: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Lisa Grossman: 0.0%Science News: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Lisa Grossman: 0.0%Science News: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 6.3%Lisa Grossman: 1.0%Science News: 0.8%Unattributed Quote6.3%This article: 0.0%Lisa Grossman: 0.5%Science News: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Lisa Grossman: 1.6%Science News: 2.6%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 3.3%Lisa Grossman: 0.3%Science News: 0.9%Indoctrination3.3%This article: 0.0%Lisa Grossman: 0.0%Science News: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lisa Grossman: 0.0%Science News: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lisa Grossman: 0.4%Science News: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

365 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker16%attributed speech306writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageJenniskens • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageJenniskens • 12 words • 100.0% coverageJenniskens • 13 words • 0.0% coverageJenniskens • 3 words • 100.0% coverageJenniskens • 11 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Jenniskens

100%flagged-word coverage
59 attributed words100% of attributed speech44% writer coverage
0%20.0%40.0%Unattributed Quote+39.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Jenniskens: 39.0%39.0%Indoctrination+20.3 ptsWriter: 0.0%Jenniskens: 20.3%20.3%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.