Topic summary
12% 6 analyzed articles/videos 2,789 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Origin Of Life results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Hasty Generalization , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 1,133 hits . Analysis detected 8,342 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,639 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 18% (13,607 of 16,558 topics). This Origin Of Life is better (less manipulative) than 82.20% of the peer group. Origin Of Life
Topic details
Total words: 12,639
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.8% percentile 1.8% BS Score6 analyzed articles12.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 9.0% 9.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst