Author summary
17% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,234 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elizabeth Howell results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Authority , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 415 hits . Analysis detected 3,477 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,347 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 52% (3,188 of 6,628 authors). This Elizabeth Howell is worse (more manipulative) than 51.90% of the peer group. Elizabeth Howell
Author details
Total words: 4,347
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.9% percentile 2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.6% 5.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.5% 1.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 9.6% 9.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.6%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 9.6%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 9.1%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.7%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.8% Slippery Slope: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Composition/Division: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst