Keyword summary
8%2 analyzed articles/videos1,086 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Organic Matter results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Overconfidence Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 5.6% saturation with 242 hits. Analysis detected 2,085 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,344 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 19% (30,428 of 37,536 keywords). This Organic Matter is better (less manipulative) than 81.10% of the peer group.
Organic Matter
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
19%Organic Matter (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,344
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

19% percentile
025507510018.9% percentile
1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.3%Composition/Division: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos