Keyword summary
6%2 analyzed articles/videos954 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amino Acids results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Anecdotal, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 222 hits. Analysis detected 1,486 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,227 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 22% (29,551 of 37,536 keywords). This Amino Acids is better (less manipulative) than 78.70% of the peer group.
Amino Acids
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
22%Amino Acids (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,227
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

21% percentile
025507510021.3% percentile
1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Red Herring: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate