Engadget42%

NASA shares beautiful timelapse of the Psyche spacecraft's view over Mars 73%

By Cheyenne MacDonald24%

7/19/2026, 7:08:51 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 15 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Self-Serving Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 71.2% saturation with 178 hits. Analysis detected 826 faulty-reasoning hits from 250 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 64.7% and a BS Rank of 73% (6,117 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 72.10% of the article peer group.

NASA's Psyche spacecraft is well on its way to its target in the asteroid belt after receiving a gravity assist from Mars in May, and the space agency just shared some incredible images from that brief encounter. 
Psyche captured thousands of images with its multispectral imager as it approached and flew past Mars. 
A timelapse shared by NASA on Friday stitches these images together to create a captivating video of the entire encounter, showing the crescent Mars it captured upon arrival, detailed views of the surface and the icy south pole behind it as it departed. 
"The imager performed brilliantly, delivering some rarely seen views of the red planet," said Jim Bell, the Psyche imager instrument lead at Arizona State University, in a statement. 
The spacecraft began its approach of Mars on May 2 and made its closest approach on May 15. 
This maneuver gave it a speed boost and adjusted its trajectory to put it on a course for the asteroid Psyche while saving propellant for the long journey. 
Psyche is expected to reach the eponymous asteroid in 2029. 
"Besides the obvious beauty of the photos, we were also able to fully test its calibration and sensitivity to scattered light," Bell said, "including picking out the Martian moons Phobos and Deimos from very far away as a part of a practice for the satellite search that we'll use at the asteroid Psyche to look for any moonlets there." 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 11.2%Cheyenne MacDonald: 1.5%Engadget: 3.1%Confirmation Bias11.2%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.0%Engadget: 1.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 14.8%Cheyenne MacDonald: 3.3%Engadget: 3.1%Availability Heuristic14.8%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.8%Engadget: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.0%Engadget: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 4.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 1.5%Engadget: 2.6%Overconfidence Bias4.0%This article: 21.6%Cheyenne MacDonald: 4.7%Engadget: 6.0%Framing Effect21.6%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.0%Engadget: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 1.2%Engadget: 0.8%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.6%Engadget: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 14.8%Cheyenne MacDonald: 6.3%Engadget: 4.6%Optimism Bias14.8%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.0%Engadget: 2.2%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 3.8%Engadget: 7.0%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 23.6%Cheyenne MacDonald: 2.9%Engadget: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias23.6%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.0%Engadget: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.0%Engadget: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.0%Engadget: 0.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.0%Engadget: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 39.2%Cheyenne MacDonald: 4.2%Engadget: 1.9%Halo Effect39.2%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.0%Engadget: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.0%Engadget: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 17.2%Cheyenne MacDonald: 4.5%Engadget: 1.8%Recency Bias17.2%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.2%Engadget: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.0%Engadget: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.4%Engadget: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.0%Engadget: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 11.2%Cheyenne MacDonald: 8.7%Engadget: 4.9%Appeal to Authority11.2%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.5%Engadget: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.0%Engadget: 1.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.5%Engadget: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.8%Engadget: 5.3%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.0%Engadget: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.6%Engadget: 0.9%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 32.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 4.8%Engadget: 3.2%Appeal to Emotion32.0%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.8%Engadget: 1.0%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 11.2%Cheyenne MacDonald: 1.4%Engadget: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)11.2%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.0%Engadget: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.0%Engadget: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.0%Engadget: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.0%Engadget: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 1.6%Engadget: 2.3%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.0%Engadget: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 23.6%Cheyenne MacDonald: 1.7%Engadget: 2.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)23.6%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.0%Engadget: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.1%Engadget: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.3%Engadget: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.0%Engadget: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.0%Engadget: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 23.6%Cheyenne MacDonald: 2.7%Engadget: 2.9%Unattributed Quote23.6%This article: 11.2%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.7%Engadget: 1.2%Quote-first Misdirection11.2%This article: 71.2%Cheyenne MacDonald: 10.3%Engadget: 7.5%Biased Writer Voice71.2%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.3%Engadget: 1.0%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.0%Engadget: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.0%Engadget: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 1.0%Engadget: 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

250 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker35%attributed speech163writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 100.0% coverageJim Bell • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageJim Bell • 59 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Jim Bell

100%flagged-word coverage
87 attributed words100% of attributed speech79% writer coverage
0%37.5%75.0%Biased Writer Voice-5.2 ptsWriter: 73.0%Jim Bell: 67.8%67.8%Unattributed Quote+67.8 ptsWriter: 0.0%Jim Bell: 67.8%67.8%Quote-first Misdirection+32.2 ptsWriter: 0.0%Jim Bell: 32.2%32.2%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.