Keyword summary
70% 12 analyzed articles/videos 6,991 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mars results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Unattributed Quote , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 2,725 hits . Analysis detected 25,087 faulty-reasoning hits from 27,844 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 17% (31,407 of 37,536 keywords). This Mars is better (less manipulative) than 83.70% of the peer group. Mars
Keyword details
Total words: 27,844
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.3% percentile 1.8% BS Score12 analyzed articles27.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.4% 8.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 9.8% 9.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 1.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst