Author summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 4,881 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Richard Luscombe results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Anecdotal , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 2,444 hits . Analysis detected 19,823 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,420 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 50% (3,337 of 6,628 authors). This Richard Luscombe is better (less manipulative) than 50.30% of the peer group. Richard Luscombe
Author details
Total words: 17,420
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.7% percentile 2.6% BS Score4 analyzed articles17.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.1% 10.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.9% 6.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.3% 10.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 14.0% 14.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.0% 6.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.8% 5.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.5% 4.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.9%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 14.0%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Author 7.2%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.9%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.1%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst