Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,303 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fran Lawther results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 485 hits . Analysis detected 2,594 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,212 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 28% (4,812 of 6,628 authors). This Fran Lawther is better (less manipulative) than 72.60% of the peer group. Fran Lawther
Author details
Total words: 5,212
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.4% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 9.3% 9.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 9.3%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 7.0%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.8% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.5% Primacy Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst