Pluto has landslides 4%

By Katherine Kornei0%

7/10/2026, 5:00:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Optimism Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 26.8% saturation with 97 hits. Analysis detected 620 faulty-reasoning hits from 362 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 18.5% and a BS Rank of 4% (20,316 of 21,145 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 96.10% of the article peer group.

Terrestrial planets experience landslides in spades, and so do some moons, asteroids and coms. 
But  until now  they’ve never been definitively spotted on Pluto, even though the icy world has all the ingredients necessary for their formation. 
Images taken by the New Horizons spacecraft reveal six large landslides on the dwarf planet, researchers report June 13 in Icarus. 
Rocky bodies ranging from Earth to Phobos (a moon of Mars) to the asteroid Vesta all exhibit evidence of landslides. 
These mass movements can sculpt an environment, delivering solid material and nutrients to new places, says Maria Teresa Brunetti, a physicist who studies landslides at the National Research Council in Perugia, Italy. 
“Landslides play an important role in shaping landforms.” 
A reanalysis of New Horizons data changes that. 
Researchers, including Brunetti, looked for characteristic signs of landslides, such as steep cliffs and portions of the landscape that differed in tone and texture from their surroundings. 
Six features fit the profile, all of them near a wide, flat plain known as Sputnik Planitia. 
The team spotted a landslide, outlined in red, spilling into Coughlin crater. 
The dashed white line indicates a cratering event that may have precipitated this landslide. 
Each of the landslides is located along the inner rim of an impact crater, where the terrain is steep. 
The largest is roughly 130 square kilometers in area, or about twice the size of Manhattan. 
That’s near the upper size range of landslides that typically occur on Earth, Brunetti says. 
The landslides range in height from 1,500 to 2,200 meters. 
That’s somewhat puny compared with landslides elsewhere in the solar system, but these features have a trick up their proverbial sleeves: Compared with landslides of similar heights, those on Pluto tend to run out over longer distances. 
That’s a sign that material tumbling down a slope on Pluto experiences less friction, on average, the team concluded. 
That conclusion can help constrain the material properties of Pluto, Brunetti and her colleagues suggest. 
Pluto is probably home to many more landslides, the team says. 
Finding them, Brunetti says, will require more analysis of New Horizons data  and, hopefully, more missions to Pluto. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 26.8%Katherine Kornei: 3.7%Science News: 2.6%Confirmation Bias26.8%This article: 5.2%Katherine Kornei: 2.1%Science News: 1.1%Anchoring Bias5.2%This article: 8.3%Katherine Kornei: 3.5%Science News: 2.5%Availability Heuristic8.3%This article: 10.2%Katherine Kornei: 0.0%Science News: 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic10.2%This article: 0.0%Katherine Kornei: 0.0%Science News: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 4.1%Katherine Kornei: 0.0%Science News: 2.5%Overconfidence Bias4.1%This article: 0.0%Katherine Kornei: 5.1%Science News: 4.2%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Kornei: 0.0%Science News: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 5.2%Katherine Kornei: 0.0%Science News: 0.3%Status Quo Bias5.2%This article: 0.0%Katherine Kornei: 0.0%Science News: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 15.2%Katherine Kornei: 1.5%Science News: 4.2%Optimism Bias15.2%This article: 0.0%Katherine Kornei: 0.0%Science News: 1.2%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 10.2%Katherine Kornei: 0.0%Science News: 4.1%Negativity Bias10.2%This article: 0.0%Katherine Kornei: 0.0%Science News: 0.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Kornei: 0.0%Science News: 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Kornei: 0.0%Science News: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Kornei: 0.0%Science News: 0.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Kornei: 0.0%Science News: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 8.8%Katherine Kornei: 0.0%Science News: 1.4%Halo Effect8.8%This article: 0.0%Katherine Kornei: 0.0%Science News: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Kornei: 0.0%Science News: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Kornei: 0.0%Science News: 0.8%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Kornei: 0.0%Science News: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Kornei: 0.0%Science News: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Kornei: 0.0%Science News: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Kornei: 0.0%Science News: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 21.0%Katherine Kornei: 0.0%Science News: 4.5%Appeal to Authority21.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Kornei: 0.0%Science News: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Kornei: 0.0%Science News: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Kornei: 0.0%Science News: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.9%Katherine Kornei: 2.6%Science News: 4.0%Hasty Generalization6.9%This article: 0.0%Katherine Kornei: 0.0%Science News: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Kornei: 0.0%Science News: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 5.2%Katherine Kornei: 0.0%Science News: 2.6%Appeal to Emotion5.2%This article: 6.9%Katherine Kornei: 0.0%Science News: 0.5%Begging the Question6.9%This article: 9.1%Katherine Kornei: 0.0%Science News: 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)9.1%This article: 0.0%Katherine Kornei: 0.0%Science News: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Kornei: 0.0%Science News: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Kornei: 0.0%Science News: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 5.5%Katherine Kornei: 0.0%Science News: 0.2%Composition/Division5.5%This article: 0.0%Katherine Kornei: 0.0%Science News: 1.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Kornei: 0.0%Science News: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 14.9%Katherine Kornei: 0.0%Science News: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)14.9%This article: 0.0%Katherine Kornei: 0.0%Science News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Kornei: 0.0%Science News: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Kornei: 0.0%Science News: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Kornei: 0.0%Science News: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Kornei: 0.0%Science News: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.2%Katherine Kornei: 0.0%Science News: 0.8%Unattributed Quote2.2%This article: 0.0%Katherine Kornei: 0.0%Science News: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 5.2%Katherine Kornei: 0.0%Science News: 2.6%Biased Writer Voice5.2%This article: 0.0%Katherine Kornei: 0.0%Science News: 0.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Kornei: 0.0%Science News: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Kornei: 0.0%Science News: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Kornei: 0.0%Science News: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

362 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker25%attributed speech273writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageMaria Teresa Brunetti • 32 words • 0.0% coverageMaria Teresa Brunetti • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageMaria Teresa Brunetti • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageMaria Teresa Brunetti • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageMaria Teresa Brunetti • 19 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Maria Teresa Brunetti

100%flagged-word coverage
89 attributed words100% of attributed speech91% writer coverage
0%12.5%25.0%Biased Writer Voice+21.3 ptsWriter: 0.0%Maria Teresa Brunetti: 21.3%21.3%Unattributed Quote+9.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Maria Teresa Brunetti: 9.0%9.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.