Keyword summary
66% 50 analyzed articles/videos 33,799 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Space results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Authority , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 10,196 hits . Analysis detected 109,200 faulty-reasoning hits from 147,213 analyzed words across 50 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 6% (34,146 of 36,203 keywords). This Space is better (less manipulative) than 94.30% of the peer group. Space
Keyword details
Total words: 147,213
Article count: 50
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.7% percentile 1.4% BS Score50 analyzed articles147.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst