Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Georgina Torbet results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 35.7% saturation with 1,048 hits . Analysis detected 6,939 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,937 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,359 authors). This Georgina Torbet is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Georgina Torbet
Author details
Total words: 2,937
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 35.7% 35.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 19.9% 19.9% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 13.5% 13.5% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 12.6% 12.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 24.0% 24.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 13.8% 13.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 21.6% 21.6% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Author 6.8% 6.8% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Author 35.7%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 21.6%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 24.0%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 19.9%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 13.8%, sitewide 8.1% Slippery Slope: Author 13.5%, sitewide 1.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 13.0%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 12.6%, sitewide 2.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.9%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 7.5% Bandwagon: Author 6.8%, sitewide 2.2% Halo Effect: Author 6.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 1.9% Anecdotal: Author 5.1%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Author 5.1%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.2%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.8% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.3% Loss Aversion: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst