Author summary
7% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,224 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Olivia Maule results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 4.2% saturation with 496 hits . Analysis detected 7,024 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,691 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 17% (5,307 of 6,357 authors). This Olivia Maule is better (less manipulative) than 83.50% of the peer group. Olivia Maule
Author details
Total words: 11,691
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.5% percentile 1.6% BS Score4 analyzed articles11.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.8% 2.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst