Author summary
51%3 analyzed articles/videos1,347 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jeremy White results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Framing Effect, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 877 hits. Analysis detected 6,859 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,147 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 30% (4,449 of 6,316 authors). This Jeremy White is better (less manipulative) than 70.40% of the peer group.
Jeremy White
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
30%Jeremy White (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 9,147
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

30% percentile
025507510029.6% percentile
2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.7%5.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.6%0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 6.5%6.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.5%5.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.2%0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.7%3.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Author 9.6%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.7%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 6.5%, sitewide 0.5%Optimism Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 0.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate