Topic summary
⁠0%4 analyzed articles/videos904 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nuclear Policy results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 803 hits. Analysis detected 7,402 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,348 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (8,038 of 15,261 topics). This Nuclear Policy is better (less manipulative) than 52.70% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

47% percentile
025507510047.3% percentile
2.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.4%7.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.2%9.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 10.9%10.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 9.5%9.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos