Topic summary
⁠38%5 analyzed articles/videos3,388 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New York Mets results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Halo Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 1,485 hits. Analysis detected 11,470 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,018 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (10,269 of 15,787 topics). This New York Mets is better (less manipulative) than 65.00% of the peer group.
New York Mets
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 11,018
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

35% percentile
025507510035.0% percentile
2.4% BS Score5 analyzed articles11K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.6%8.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.5%13.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.4%2.4%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.1%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos