Author summary
92%2 analyzed articles/videos1,272 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Evan Macy results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 619 hits. Analysis detected 4,861 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,816 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 65% (2,276 of 6,348 authors). This Evan Macy is worse (more manipulative) than 64.20% of the peer group.
Evan Macy
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
65%Evan Macy (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,816
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

64% percentile
025507510064.2% percentile
3.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.0%4.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 16.2%16.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.4%10.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.6%0.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 8.7%8.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.4%2.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 5.9%5.9%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 6.3%6.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 10.4%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 16.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 10.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.6%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 8.7%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.7%Recency Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Horn Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.0%Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos