Author summary
92% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,272 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Evan Macy results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 619 hits . Analysis detected 4,861 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,816 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 65% (2,276 of 6,348 authors). This Evan Macy is worse (more manipulative) than 64.20% of the peer group. Evan Macy
Author details
Total words: 3,816
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
64% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 64.2% percentile 3.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 16.2% 16.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.4% 10.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 8.7% 8.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.4% 2.4% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 5.9% 5.9% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 6.3% 6.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.4%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 16.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.3%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.6%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 8.7%, sitewide 3.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Recency Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 1.9% Anecdotal: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Horn Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.0% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst