Topic summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 6,351 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Military Actions results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 2,405 hits . Analysis detected 12,518 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,744 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 10% (14,203 of 15,769 topics). This Military Actions is better (less manipulative) than 90.10% of the peer group. Military Actions
Topic details
Total words: 19,744
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.9% percentile 1.6% BS Score4 analyzed articles19.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 12.2% 12.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.5% 7.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.0% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst