Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,814 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Menelaos Hadjicostis results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 5.1% saturation with 371 hits. Analysis detected 2,763 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,256 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 14% (5,531 of 6,366 authors). This Menelaos Hadjicostis is better (less manipulative) than 86.90% of the peer group.
Menelaos Hadjicostis
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
14%Menelaos Hadjicostis (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 7,256
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

13% percentile
025507510013.1% percentile
1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.3%4.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.9%4.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.1%5.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.0%5.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos