Topic summary
0% 7 analyzed articles/videos 354 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mideast Conflict results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Optimism Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 34% saturation with 774 hits . Analysis detected 4,671 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,276 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.6% and a BS Rank of 87% (2,023 of 15,359 topics). This Mideast Conflict is worse (more manipulative) than 86.80% of the peer group. Mideast Conflict
Topic details
Total words: 2,276
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
87% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 86.8% percentile 7.6% BS Score7 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 18.4% 18.4% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 12.0% 12.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 14.8% 14.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 27.8% 27.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 8.8% 8.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 34.0% 34.0% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 10.1% 10.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 9.4% 9.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 34.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 27.8%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 10.1%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 9.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 1.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 7.5% Recency Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 2.7% Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.2%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 4.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Indoctrination: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst