Topic summary
62% 9 analyzed articles/videos 3,878 analyzed words
BS Summary: These International Sports results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Halo Effect , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 1,896 hits . Analysis detected 17,173 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,532 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 26% (11,750 of 15,772 topics). This International Sports is better (less manipulative) than 74.50% of the peer group. International Sports
Topic details
Total words: 16,532
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.5% percentile 2.1% BS Score9 analyzed articles16.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.5% 11.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 11.3% 11.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst