Topic summary
47% 8 analyzed articles/videos 4,109 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hamas results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 2,586 hits . Analysis detected 22,019 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,158 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 40% (9,555 of 15,780 topics). This Hamas is better (less manipulative) than 60.50% of the peer group. Hamas
Topic details
Total words: 18,158
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.5% percentile 2.5% BS Score8 analyzed articles18.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.5% 11.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 10.8% 10.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 14.2% 14.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.4% Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst