Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video121 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emily Rose results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 53.7% saturation with 260 hits. Analysis detected 1,887 faulty-reasoning hits from 484 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 19.5% and a BS Rank of 99% (80 of 6,521 authors). This Emily Rose is worse (more manipulative) than 98.80% of the peer group.
Emily Rose
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
99%Emily Rose (selected)20%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 484
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

99% percentile
025507510098.8% percentile
19.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles484 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 47.9%47.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 38.0%38.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 50.2%50.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 53.7%53.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 28.5%28.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 29.8%29.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 22.3%22.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 15.7%15.7%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Author 15.7%15.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 8.3%8.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Author 53.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 50.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 47.9%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 38.0%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Author 29.8%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Author 28.5%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 22.3%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 15.7%, sitewide 0.8%Hindsight Bias: Author 15.7%, sitewide 1.4%Availability Heuristic: Author 14.9%, sitewide 9.1%Slippery Slope: Author 9.3%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 4.0%Burden of Proof: Author 8.3%, sitewide 0.4%Confirmation Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Author 8.3%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Author 7.4%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.6%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos