Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 121 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maayan Lubell results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 53.7% saturation with 260 hits . Analysis detected 1,887 faulty-reasoning hits from 484 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 19.5% and a BS Rank of 99% (81 of 6,629 authors). This Maayan Lubell is worse (more manipulative) than 98.80% of the peer group. Maayan Lubell
Author details
Total words: 484
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
99% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 98.8% percentile 19.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles484 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 47.9% 47.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 38.0% 38.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 50.2% 50.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 53.7% 53.7% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 28.5% 28.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 29.8% 29.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 22.3% 22.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 15.7% 15.7% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 15.7% 15.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 8.3% 8.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Framing Effect: Author 53.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 50.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 47.9%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 38.0%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 29.8%, sitewide 8.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 28.5%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 22.3%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 15.7%, sitewide 0.8% Hindsight Bias: Author 15.7%, sitewide 1.4% Availability Heuristic: Author 14.9%, sitewide 9.1% Slippery Slope: Author 9.3%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 4.0% Burden of Proof: Author 8.3%, sitewide 0.4% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 7.5% Indoctrination: Author 8.3%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Author 7.4%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.6%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst