Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,217 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Seham Tantesh results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 717 hits . Analysis detected 4,421 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,868 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 62% (2,451 of 6,455 authors). This Seham Tantesh is worse (more manipulative) than 62.00% of the peer group. Seham Tantesh
Author details
Total words: 4,868
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 62.0% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.4% 10.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 11.7% 11.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.7% 14.7% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 5.5% 5.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 14.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.2%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 1.9% Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Slippery Slope: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst