Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,395 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julian Borger results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 1,234 hits . Analysis detected 8,274 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,580 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 36% (4,053 of 6,316 authors). This Julian Borger is better (less manipulative) than 64.20% of the peer group. Julian Borger
Author details
Total words: 9,580
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.8% percentile 2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.9% 12.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.4%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst