Topic summary
0% 6 analyzed articles/videos 8,471 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Graham Platner results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 2,855 hits . Analysis detected 28,974 faulty-reasoning hits from 33,884 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 13% (13,778 of 15,755 topics). This Graham Platner is better (less manipulative) than 87.50% of the peer group. Graham Platner
Topic details
Total words: 33,884
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.5% percentile 1.7% BS Score6 analyzed articles33.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.6% 6.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.4% 8.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst