Topic summary
63% 9 analyzed articles/videos 4,089 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Government Appointments results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Halo Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 3,085 hits . Analysis detected 24,450 faulty-reasoning hits from 26,299 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 23% (12,270 of 15,780 topics). This Government Appointments is better (less manipulative) than 77.80% of the peer group. Government Appointments
Topic details
Total words: 26,299
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.2% percentile 2.0% BS Score9 analyzed articles26.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.7% 11.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.0% 7.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.8% 10.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst