Publication summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Healio results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Optimism Bias, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 248 hits. Analysis detected 1,056 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,715 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 400 publications). This Healio is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Healio
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
0%WSB-TV Channel 2 - Atlanta1%
1%Brookings1%
1%The Banner1%
1%FactCheck.org1%
1%@politifact1%
99%Utah Hockey Club13%
100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
100%MS NOW Live Events26%
100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
100%NBC 6 South Florida33%
0%Healio (selected)0%
Publication details
Total words: 2,715
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Publication 9.1%9.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Publication 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Publication 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Publication 2.1%2.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Publication 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Publication 2.9%2.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Publication 2.7%2.7%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Publication 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Publication 9.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Straw Man: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 0.9%Burden of Proof: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 0.4%Red Herring: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate

Analyzed articles and videos