Publication summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Healio results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Optimism Bias , and Anecdotal , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 248 hits . Analysis detected 1,056 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,715 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 410 publications). This Healio is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 2,715
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Publication SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 9.1% 9.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 2.1% 2.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Publication 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 2.9% 2.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 2.7% 2.7% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Publication 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 9.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 1.5% Genetic Fallacy: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 1.1%, sitewide 0.8% Straw Man: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 0.9% Burden of Proof: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 0.4% Red Herring: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 0.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst