Topic summary
22% 10 analyzed articles/videos 3,070 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Global Trade results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Optimism Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 4.7% saturation with 1,544 hits . Analysis detected 19,982 faulty-reasoning hits from 33,096 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 4% (15,334 of 15,854 topics). This Global Trade is better (less manipulative) than 96.70% of the peer group. Global Trade
Topic details
Total words: 33,096
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.3% percentile 1.3% BS Score10 analyzed articles33.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst