Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Christopher Sands results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 2.4% saturation with 389 hits . Analysis detected 2,785 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,506 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,614 authors). This Christopher Sands is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Christopher Sands
Author details
Total words: 16,506
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles16.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.3% 1.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.2% 0.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst