Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,293 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Calabrese results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 471 hits . Analysis detected 3,668 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,172 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 51% (3,202 of 6,499 authors). This John Calabrese is worse (more manipulative) than 50.70% of the peer group. John Calabrese
Author details
Total words: 5,172
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.7% percentile 2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.1% 9.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.6% 5.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.9% 2.9% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Slippery Slope: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Begging the Question: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.4% Composition/Division: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst