Topic summary
â 0% 7 analyzed articles/videos 15,549 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Georgia results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.4% saturation with 3,123 hits . Analysis detected 22,301 faulty-reasoning hits from 48,789 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of â 1% (15,316 of 15,447 topics). This Georgia is better (less manipulative) than 99.20% of the peer group. Georgia
Topic details
Total words: 48,789
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.8% percentile 1.0% BS Score7 analyzed articles48.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst