Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,400 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jake Fenner results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Availability Heuristic , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 578 hits . Analysis detected 5,076 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,926 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 38% (3,929 of 6,244 authors). This Jake Fenner is better (less manipulative) than 62.90% of the peer group. Jake Fenner
Author details
Total words: 5,926
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.1% percentile 2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.8% 9.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.4% 2.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.1% 2.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.4% 5.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 8.8% 8.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.4%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.8%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.4% Recency Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst