Topic summary
20% 15 analyzed articles/videos 10,930 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Genetics results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Overconfidence Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 4,153 hits . Analysis detected 35,907 faulty-reasoning hits from 57,288 analyzed words across 15 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 3% (15,022 of 15,447 topics). This Genetics is better (less manipulative) than 97.20% of the peer group. Genetics
Topic details
Total words: 57,288
Article count: 15
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.8% percentile 1.3% BS Score15 analyzed articles57.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.2% 4.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst