Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,400 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anna Goldfield results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Appeal to Emotion , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 3.6% saturation with 204 hits . Analysis detected 2,231 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,600 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 3% (6,128 of 6,316 authors). This Anna Goldfield is better (less manipulative) than 97.00% of the peer group. Anna Goldfield
Author details
Total words: 5,600
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.0% percentile 1.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.1% 0.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.5% Slippery Slope: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst