Author summary
17%3 analyzed articles/videos2,497 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tina Hesman Saey results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 597 hits. Analysis detected 5,039 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,197 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 11% (5,503 of 6,172 authors). This Tina Hesman Saey is better (less manipulative) than 89.20% of the peer group.
Tina Hesman Saey
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
11%Tina Hesman Saey (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 10,197
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

11% percentile
025507510010.8% percentile
1.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.9%3.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.8%5.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.4%4.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.3%3.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.6%1.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.5%0.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos