Pompeii’s survivors shine in a new documentary series 71%

By Tina Hesman Saey17%

7/20/2026, 5:00:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 25.2% saturation with 155 hits. Analysis detected 1,221 faulty-reasoning hits from 616 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 64% and a BS Rank of 71% (6,135 of 20,978 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 70.80% of the article peer group.

Pompeii is best known as a tomb. 
The ancient Roman city’s inhabitants were instantly encased in ash when Mount VesuA new documentary series tells a different story: one about survivors. 
<em>Pompeii: Out of Time</em>, hosted by actor Tom Hiddleston of Marvel franchise fame, follows three real Romans through the last day of Pompeii and nearby Herculaneum. 
Across three episodes  premiering July 22 on National Geographic and July 23 on Disney+ and Hulu  we meet Avianius, a teenage bronzesmith apprentice, Julia Felix, a bathhouse owner, and an unnamed Praetorian guard. 
Their existence (and fate) has been confirmed through historical records and archaeological evidence. 
The show fills gaps in those records with fiction, drawing insights from disaster psychology to imagine how these people may have reacted as <a href="https://www.sciencenews.org/article/earthquakes-upped-pompeii-death-toll">earthquakes shook Pompeii</a> and the volcano began belching ash and molten rock. 
By intermingling evidence and imagination, the series does a brilliant job bringing ancient human stories to life. 
And Mount Vesuvius’ destructive timeline is the ticking clock that adds pressure and urgency to every scene. 
Hiddleston, who studied Classics at the University of Cambridge, explains that the Latin words for history and story are the same. 
Director and showrunner Tom Barbor-Might, producer Kevin Wright and Hiddleston “decided somewhat rebelliously that we wanted to invent a new form of documentary,” Hiddleston said in an interview with <em>Science News</em>. 
“This is a different way of telling a true story,” Barbor-Might told me. 
In each episode, Hiddleston time travels seamlessly between the present in Pompeii’s ruins to the past, which are sets reconstructed with millimeter precision in Malta. 
He rewinds time with a twist of his hand to play out different scenarios. 
The documentary is clear about what’s backed by facts and evidence and what’s dramatization. 
Avianius is the first Roman we meet. 
The series’ creators found him in a historian’s database of inscriptions placing people in Pompeii shortly before the eruption and locating them elsewhere after the disaster. 
The scenarios created for Avianius are particularly poignant: He argues with his single mother and has fits of teenage pique. 
He’s ultimately a scared boy trying to survive a nightmare scenario. 
Next, we meet Julia Felix, whose estate was one of the first houses ever excavated in Pompeii, says archaeologist Caitie Barrett of Cornell University. 
Barrett helps Hiddleston tell Felix’s story: She was unusual in Roman culture as an independent woman who owned a business. 
Archaeologists found no sign of horses, carts or treasures  except a necklace  suggesting her wealthy estate was evacuated. 
The documentary heartbreakingly explores decisions that Felix, her guests and employees may have made about whether to stay or go as conditions outside become increasingly dire. 
The series imagines the final character, the Praetorian guard, as a jaded veteran who may have helped people escape the nearby city Herculaneum. 
His story illustrates the panic many people probably experienced and the cooler heads that could have allowed most of Herculaneum’s residents to flee before the city was buried. 
<em>Pompeii: Out of Time</em> bills itself as telling the stories of survivors, so (slight spoiler) I was crushed to learn that not all the protagonists survived the disaster. 
No one knows the actual circumstances these people lived through, but the documentary explores plausible scenarios. 
That’s something historians and archaeologists often do when physical evidence is lacking, Barrett says. 
“I think there&#8217;s no way to avoid using some amount of hypothesis testing in the stories we tell about the past,” Barrett says. 
She appreciates that the series “uses informed reconstruction of people&#8217;s biographies as a way to emotionally engage with the past, because these were real people. 
They did have real lives.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.4%Tina Hesman Saey: 2.1%Science News: 2.6%Confirmation Bias4.4%This article: 0.0%Tina Hesman Saey: 0.3%Science News: 1.1%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 1.1%Tina Hesman Saey: 0.8%Science News: 2.5%Availability Heuristic1.1%This article: 12.8%Tina Hesman Saey: 1.3%Science News: 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic12.8%This article: 4.5%Tina Hesman Saey: 0.6%Science News: 0.5%Hindsight Bias4.5%This article: 6.2%Tina Hesman Saey: 1.5%Science News: 2.5%Overconfidence Bias6.2%This article: 3.7%Tina Hesman Saey: 3.9%Science News: 4.2%Framing Effect3.7%This article: 4.5%Tina Hesman Saey: 0.7%Science News: 0.3%Loss Aversion4.5%This article: 2.3%Tina Hesman Saey: 0.1%Science News: 0.3%Status Quo Bias2.3%This article: 0.0%Tina Hesman Saey: 0.0%Science News: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 4.5%Tina Hesman Saey: 3.3%Science News: 4.2%Optimism Bias4.5%This article: 5.4%Tina Hesman Saey: 0.9%Science News: 1.2%Pessimism Bias5.4%This article: 20.3%Tina Hesman Saey: 5.9%Science News: 4.1%Negativity Bias20.3%This article: 0.0%Tina Hesman Saey: 0.1%Science News: 0.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tina Hesman Saey: 0.0%Science News: 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Tina Hesman Saey: 0.0%Science News: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tina Hesman Saey: 0.0%Science News: 0.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tina Hesman Saey: 0.0%Science News: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 6.0%Tina Hesman Saey: 1.6%Science News: 1.4%Halo Effect6.0%This article: 0.0%Tina Hesman Saey: 0.0%Science News: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tina Hesman Saey: 0.0%Science News: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tina Hesman Saey: 0.4%Science News: 0.8%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 9.6%Tina Hesman Saey: 0.6%Science News: 0.3%Primacy Effect9.6%This article: 0.0%Tina Hesman Saey: 0.0%Science News: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tina Hesman Saey: 1.2%Science News: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Tina Hesman Saey: 0.0%Science News: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 17.0%Tina Hesman Saey: 3.3%Science News: 4.5%Appeal to Authority17.0%This article: 2.6%Tina Hesman Saey: 0.2%Science News: 1.1%False Dilemma2.6%This article: 0.0%Tina Hesman Saey: 3.0%Science News: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Tina Hesman Saey: 0.0%Science News: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 3.2%Tina Hesman Saey: 2.3%Science News: 4.0%Hasty Generalization3.2%This article: 0.0%Tina Hesman Saey: 0.0%Science News: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Tina Hesman Saey: 0.4%Science News: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 25.2%Tina Hesman Saey: 4.4%Science News: 2.6%Appeal to Emotion25.2%This article: 6.2%Tina Hesman Saey: 0.5%Science News: 0.5%Begging the Question6.2%This article: 0.0%Tina Hesman Saey: 0.0%Science News: 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Tina Hesman Saey: 0.0%Science News: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 2.1%Tina Hesman Saey: 0.5%Science News: 0.4%Burden of Proof2.1%This article: 0.0%Tina Hesman Saey: 0.0%Science News: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Tina Hesman Saey: 0.0%Science News: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 8.1%Tina Hesman Saey: 0.5%Science News: 1.2%Anecdotal8.1%This article: 0.0%Tina Hesman Saey: 0.0%Science News: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Tina Hesman Saey: 0.3%Science News: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Tina Hesman Saey: 0.0%Science News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Tina Hesman Saey: 0.0%Science News: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Tina Hesman Saey: 0.1%Science News: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Tina Hesman Saey: 0.0%Science News: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Tina Hesman Saey: 0.0%Science News: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.7%Tina Hesman Saey: 0.7%Science News: 0.8%Unattributed Quote3.7%This article: 2.1%Tina Hesman Saey: 1.7%Science News: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection2.1%This article: 23.5%Tina Hesman Saey: 3.6%Science News: 2.6%Biased Writer Voice23.5%This article: 0.0%Tina Hesman Saey: 0.0%Science News: 0.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Tina Hesman Saey: 1.2%Science News: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tina Hesman Saey: 0.0%Science News: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 19.0%Tina Hesman Saey: 1.1%Science News: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…19.0%

616 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers25%attributed speech460writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageTom Hiddleston • 21 words • 0.0% coverageTom Hiddleston • 31 words • 0.0% coverageTom Barbor-Might • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageCaitie Barrett • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageCaitie Barrett • 14 words • 0.0% coverageCaitie Barrett • 23 words • 100.0% coverageCaitie Barrett • 25 words • 0.0% coverageCaitie Barrett • 5 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Tom Barbor-Might

100%flagged-word coverage
13 attributed words8.3% of attributed speech97% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Tom Barbor-Might: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-31.5 ptsWriter: 31.5%Tom Barbor-Might: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -25.4 ptsWriter: 25.4%Tom Barbor-Might: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.